TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Finkelstein v. Brodsky

Louis Finkelstein, Respondent, v. Hyman Brodsky, Appellant

Finkelstein v. Brodsky, 163 A. 664 (N.J. 1933)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey · State Highest Courts
Decided
January 5, 1933
Judges
PER CURIAM.
Citations
163 A. 664110 N.J.L. 131933 N.J. LEXIS 402

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

Pee Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Circuit Court Judge Ackerson, to whom the case was referred and whose opinion is printed in 10 N. J. Mis. R.

55.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chiee Justice, Teen-chard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Brogan, Heher, Yan Buskiek, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, Keeney, JJ. 16.

For reversal — None.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1951: 119512026peak 1951 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. McEnaney v. Spedick80 A.2d 237 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1951)

Most recent

  1. McEnaney v. Spedick80 A.2d 237 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1951)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list