Richman v. Richman
Rose Gold Richman, Complainant-Respondent, v. Harry Richman, Defendant-Appellant
Richman v. Richman, 18 A.2d 403 (N.J. 1941)
Opinion of the Court
Pee Curiam.
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Advisory Master Herr in the Court of Chancery.
For affirmance — Dofges, Perskie, Porter, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Hague, JJ. 7.
For reversal — The Chiee-Justioe, Parker, Case, Bodine, I-Ieher, Raeeerty, JJ. 6.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 12 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.