Hollander v. Breeze Corporations, Inc.
Lester Hollander Et Al., Respondents, v. Breeze Corporations, Inc., Joseph J. Mascuch, John T. Mascuch, Emil L. Beh, A. Langstaff Johnston, Jr., Melville C. Healy and Joseph F. Lucas, Appellants
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.
The appeal in these cases relate to a final decree advised by Vice-Chancellor Fielder. His reasons for 4he entry thereof appear in the record in the case. We have carefully examined them and the briefs of counsel. We can only conclude that his findings of fact are supported by the proofs and that the conclusions of law find support in the well reasoned opinions cited by him.
The decree will be affirmed, with costs.
No. 216 with No. 217' — • Bor affirmance — -The Chief-Justice, Parker, Bodine, Donges, Perskie, Porter, Dear, Wells, Rafferty, Hague, Thompson, JJ. 11.
*614 For reversal — None.
For modification — Heher, Colie, JJ. 2.
No. 217 with No. 216— For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Parker, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Porter, Dear, Wells, Rafferty, Hague, Thompson, JJ. Í2.
For reversal — None.
For modification — Heher, Colie, JJ. 2.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 5 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.