Gottfried v. Gottfried
Max Gottfried, Appellant, v. Morris Gottfried, Respondent; And Albert W. Moge, Defendants
Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by Parker, J.
This appeal will be dismissed. The record, as disclosed by the printed ease laid before us, shows that the two defendants were charged as joint tort feasors, and that at the trial a nonsuit'was ordered as to the defendant Gottfried; but there is nothing to show that any judgment was rendered as to the defendant Moge.
The rule is that writ of error (or appeal tantamount thereto) will not lie unless there has been a final disposition of the case, not only as to all the issues, but also as to all the parties. 3 C. J.
462, 464. As to issues, see Sautter v. Order of Heptasophs, 74 N. J. L.
608, and cases cited. The cases in this state on parties, are Young v. Board of Educa tion, 84 Id.
770, and Wheat v. Public Service Gas Co., 97 Id.
584.
For dismissal — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenciiard, Parker, Kalisch, Black, Campbell, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, IIetfield, Diiar, JJ. 15.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 3 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.