In re Gottsmann ex rel. Gottsmann
In the Matter of the Application of August Gottsmann and Mary Greb on Behalf of Joseph Gottsmann, Sr., for Writ of Habeas Corpus.
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.
This appeal is from an order of the Chancellor, upon the advice of Vice-Chancellor Stein, discharging an order to show cause why a writ of habeas corpus should not issue and denying an application therefor.
Our examination of the record leads to the conclusion that reasonable cause was not shown. The'writ of habeas corpus is a writ of right when reasonable cause is shown, but not a writ of course.
£9 C. J. S., Habeas Corpus, § -6.
The order under review is affirmed, with costs.
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Colie, Wacheneeld, Eastwood, Burling, Wells, Dill, Rreund, McLean, Schettino, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.