TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Lanterman v. Smith

U. S. Grant Lanterman, Respondent, v. Alice M. Smith, Appellant

Lanterman v. Smith, 168 A. 748 (N.J. 1933)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey · State Highest Courts
Decided
October 16, 1933
Judges
PER CURIAM.
Citations
168 A. 748114 N.J. Eq. 2671933 N.J. LEXIS 905

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Yice-Ordinary Baches, and reported in 101 N. J. Eq. 231; sub nom. In re Lanterman.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trencharb, Parker, Case, Bobine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Van Bus-kirk, Kays, Hetfielb, Dear, Wells, Dill, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1952: 11954: 119522026peak 1952 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Janvari v. Peter Schweitzer Co.91 A.2d 113 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1952)
  2. Van Tuyl v. Federal Shipbuilding and Dry Dock Co.108 A.2d 483 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1954)

Most recent

  1. Van Tuyl v. Federal Shipbuilding and Dry Dock Co.108 A.2d 483 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1954)
  2. Janvari v. Peter Schweitzer Co.91 A.2d 113 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1952)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list