TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

State v. Ireland

State of New Jersey, Respondent, v. Bertram Ireland, Appellant

State v. Ireland, 23 A.2d 560 (N.J. 1942)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey · State Highest Courts
Decided
January 9, 1942
Judges
Campbell
Citations
23 A.2d 560127 N.J.L. 5581942 N.J. LEXIS 202

Opinion of the Court — Campbell

The opinion of the court was delivered by Campbell, Chancellor.

An Atlantic County grand jury having returned to the Oyer of that county an indictment against the appellant, he, asserting its invalidity, and for the purpose of quashing it obtained from the Supreme Court its writ of certiorari removing such accusation to that court.

The Supreme Court after hearing the cause dismissed the writ.

The present appeal must be dismissed for two reasons:

First, because the record before us does not show any judgment of the Supremo Court but simply the opinion of that court, which concludes “The writ will be dismissed, with costs.” Second, any such judgment of the Supreme Court, under long established practice, could not be a final judgment from which an appeal would lie.

Such court’s judgment could only be a dismissal of its writ and a remand of the indictment to the Oyer from whence it was brought up, or a dismissal of its writ with a holding of the indictment in that court for trial at Circuit by its designation. The final judgment from which this court would hear an appeal would be that entered upon the verdict after a trial under the indictment. This is the practice as laid down by this court.

Cf. Parks v. State, 62

N. J. L.

664;

State v. Greenwald, 66

Id.

686;

State v. Meeker, 72

Id.

210;

State v. Kelsey, 82

Id.

542;

State v. Riggs, 92

Id.

575;

Hartranft v. Mullowny, 247 U. S.

296 , 305.

The appeal is for these reasons dismissed, with costs.

For. dismissal — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Case, Donges, Heher, Colie, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Hague, Thompson, JJ. 13.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

1961: 11976: 12014: 12018: 219612026peak 2018 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. City and County of Honolulu v. Cavness364 P.2d 646 (Haw. 1961)
  2. State v. Joseph Diorio (069597)83 A.3d 831 (N.J. 2014)
  3. United States v. LaBrecque419 F. Supp. 430 (D.N.J. 1976)
  4. State v. Reid191 A.3d 713 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2018)
  5. STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. HASSAN A. REID (14-02-0224 AND 14-02-0234, MIDDLESEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)No. A-0985-17T3 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. Aug. 15, 2018)

Most recent

  1. STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. HASSAN A. REID (14-02-0224 AND 14-02-0234, MIDDLESEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)No. A-0985-17T3 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. Aug. 15, 2018)
  2. State v. Reid191 A.3d 713 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2018)
  3. State v. Joseph Diorio (069597)83 A.3d 831 (N.J. 2014)
  4. United States v. LaBrecque419 F. Supp. 430 (D.N.J. 1976)
  5. City and County of Honolulu v. Cavness364 P.2d 646 (Haw. 1961)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list