Tantum v. Keller
Harry H. Tantum, Respondent, v. Anna Keller, Appellant
Tantum v. Keller, 126 A. 925 (N.J. 1924)
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion hied in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Buchanan.
For affirmance—The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Minturn Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, Clark, McGlennon, Kays-—15.
For reversal—None.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 6 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.