TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Dinkel v. County of Hudson

John Dinkel, Appellant, v. County of Hudson, Respondent

Dinkel v. Cnty. of Hudson, 141 A. 919 (N.J. 1928)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey · State Highest Courts
Decided
May 14, 1928
Judges
PER CURIAM.
Citations
141 A. 919104 N.J.L. 6591928 N.J. LEXIS 280

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

*660 Pee Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — -The Chancellor, Parker, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Van Bus-kirk, Kays, Heteield, Dear, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list