TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Depew v. C.W. Depew Co.

Calvin M. Depew v. C.W. Depew Company

Depew v. C.W. Depew Co., 131 A. 76 (N.J. Ct. of Ch. 1925)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New Jersey Court of Chancery · State Appellate Courts
Decided
November 27, 1925
Judges
BACKES, V.C.
Citations
131 A. 7698 N.J. Eq. 46113 Stock. 4611925 N.J. Ch. LEXIS 27

Opinion of the Court

The receiver has in his possession two Mack trucks sold to the defendant company by the Mack International Motor Truck Company under a conditional bill of sale. The first of the eighteen monthly installments was paid. Those due since are in default. The receiver declines to pay and refuses to surrender the truck because a copy of the conditional *Page 462 bill of sale, filed in due form and in the proper public office, did not bear the signature of the president of the defendant company, as did the original. His claim is that it is not a true copy. It is assumed, not decided, that the copy is defective. No creditor of the defunct company had a lien by "attachment or levy" upon the trucks when the receiver was appointed.

The conditional sale was good against the company without the filing of a copy of the contract. It is void, if not filed, only as against purchasers without notice and creditors who acquire liens "by attachment or levy." 2 Comp. Stat. p. 3130. The receiver stands in the shoes of the company. As the company could not attack the contract, he cannot. Koerner v. U.S. Waxed Co., 94 N.J. Eq. 655 ; Falaenau v. Reliance Steel Foundry Co., 74 N.J. Eq. 325 ; Smith v. Hotel Ritz Co., 74 N.J. Eq. 616 .

The receiver will be ordered to hand over the property.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1933: 119332026peak 1933 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Smith v. Commercial Credit Corp.165 A. 637 (N.J. Ct. of Ch. 1933)

Most recent

  1. Smith v. Commercial Credit Corp.165 A. 637 (N.J. Ct. of Ch. 1933)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 3

DepthCaseCited by
Falaenau v. Reliance Steel Foundry Co., 69 A. 1098 (N.J. Ct. of Ch. 1908) 8
Koerner v. U. S. Waxed & Coated Paper Co., 121 A. 338 (N.J. Ct. of Ch. 1923) 5
Smith v. Hotel Ritz Co., 70 A. 137 (N.J. Ct. of Ch. 1908) 1

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list