Teitelbaum v. Massachusetts Accident Co.
Maurice Teitelbaum, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Mas Sachusetts Accident Company, a Corporation, Defendant-Appellant; Maurice Teitelbaum, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Massachusetts Accident Company, a Corporation, Defendant-Appellant
Opinion of the Court
Pee Cueiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court. It should, however, be noted that the plaintiff below admitted that he treated about four patients a week and not four patients a day as inadvertently stated in the opinion of the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancelloe, Chief Justice, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Hetfield, Deae, Wells, WolfsKeil, JJ. 10.
For reversal — None.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.