TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Katzenbach v. Tomadelli Electronic Corp.

Edward L. Katzenbach, Attorney-General, Appellant, v. the Tomadelli Electronic Corporation, Respondent

Katzenbach v. Tomadelli Elec. Corp., 140 A. 26 (N.J. 1929)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey · State Highest Courts
Decided
February 4, 1929
Judges
PER CURIAM.
Citations
140 A. 26104 N.J. Eq. 2171929 N.J. LEXIS 513

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

Per Curiam.

The order appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Backes.

*219 For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Kalisch, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, Van Bus-kirk, Kays, Heteield, Dear, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1944: 119442026peak 1944 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Wilentz v. Edwards36 A.2d 423 (N.J. 1944)

Most recent

  1. Wilentz v. Edwards36 A.2d 423 (N.J. 1944)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list