Lambert v. Trenton & Mercer County Traction Co.

Martha Lambert Et Al., Respondents, v. Trenton and Mercer County Traction Company, Appellant

Lambert v. Trenton & Mercer Cnty. Traction Co., 139 A. 718 (N.J. 1927)

Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey · State Highest Courts
Decided: December 23, 1927
Judges: PER CURIAM.
Citations: 139 A. 718104 N.J.L. 1751927 N.J. LEXIS 312

Cited by 3

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

Per Curiam.

The judgment herein is affirmed by an equally divided court.

For affirmance — Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Kays, Dear, JJ. 6.

For reversal — Parker, Kalisch, Black, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Heteield, JJ. 6.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 3 cases

View all citing references →

State Appellate Courts3

Relies on it most ⓘ

State v. Diamond83 A.2d 799 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1951)
State v. Kapelsohn75 A.2d 746 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1950)
Spinning v. Hudson & Manhattan R. Co.78 A.2d 284 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1951)

Most recent

State v. Diamond83 A.2d 799 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1951)
Spinning v. Hudson & Manhattan R. Co.78 A.2d 284 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1951)
State v. Kapelsohn75 A.2d 746 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1950)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list