Larkin v. Koether
Michael Larkin Et Al., Respondents, v. Rudolph A. Koether, Appellant
Larkin v. Koether, 140 A. 920 (N.J. 1928)
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Yice-Chaneellor Berry, and reported in 101 N. J. Fq. 116.
For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, Yan Buskirk, MoGlennon, Kays, Heteield, Dear, JJ. 14.
For reversal — None.
For modification — White, J. 1.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 3 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.