Tams v. Abrams
Peggy Tams, Individually and as Executrix of the Estate of Raymond E. Tams, Deceased, Complainant-Respondent, v. Morton Abrams, Ramos & Company, Incorporated, a New Jersey Corporation, and Paramount Investment Corporation, a New Jersey Corporation, Defendants-Appellants
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.
The pleadings and proofs in this case have been carefully examined. The conclusions of the vice-chancellor are abundantly supported by the evidence adduced.
The decree is affirmed.
For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Heteield, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeerty, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 4 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.