Sullivan v. Stout

James A. Sullivan, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Edward P. Stout, Defendant-Respondent

Sullivan v. Stout, 199 A. 1 (N.J. 1938)

Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey · State Highest Courts
Decided: April 29, 1938
Judges: PER CURIAM.
Citations: 199 A. 1120 N.J.L. 304

Cited by 19 2 descriptions by later courts

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Judge Ackerson in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chiee Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Porter, Heteield, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Baeeerty, Walker, JJ. 16.

For reversal — None.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 2 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

(which concerns a suit against an attorney for negligently preparing a title report)

Mumford v. Staton, Whaley & Price, 255 A.2d 359 (Md. 1969)
(late discovery of erroneous title search by attorney)

Fernandi v. Strully, 173 A.2d 277 (N.J. 1961)

Cited by 19 cases

View all citing references →

Relies on it most ⓘ

Mumford v. Staton, Whaley & Price255 A.2d 359 (Md. 1969)
RTC Mortgage Trust 1994 N-1 v. Fidelity National Title Insurance58 F. Supp. 2d 503 (D.N.J. 1999)
Grunwald v. Bronkesh621 A.2d 459 (N.J. 1993)
Fernandi v. Strully173 A.2d 277 (N.J. 1961)
Toth v. Vazquez65 A.2d 778 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1949)
Downing v. Vaine228 So. 2d 622 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1969)

Most recent

RTC Mortgage Trust 1994 N-1 v. Fidelity National Title Insurance58 F. Supp. 2d 503 (D.N.J. 1999)
Grunwald v. Bronkesh621 A.2d 459 (N.J. 1993)
Washington v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Companies708 P.2d 129 (Haw. 1985)
Mant v. Gillespie460 A.2d 172 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1983)
St. Pius X House of Retreats v. CAMDEN DIOCESE NJ443 A.2d 1052 (N.J. 1982)
Red Lobster Inns of America, Inc. v. Lawyers Title Insurance492 F. Supp. 933 (E.D. Ark. 1980)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list