TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Lister v. Vogel

Catherine E. Lister, Complainant-Respondent v. Nathan Vogel

Lister v. Vogel, 158 A. 534 (N.J. 1932)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey · State Highest Courts
Decided
February 1, 1932
Judges
PER CURIAM.
Citations
158 A. 534110 N.J. Eq. 351932 N.J. LEXIS 770
Cited by 3

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the conclusions of Vice-Chancellor Berry.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, DALY, DONGES, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None. *Page 42

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 3 cases

View all citing references →
1941: 11948: 11951: 119412026peak 1941 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Casriel v. King58 A.2d 269 (N.J. Ct. of Ch. 1948)
  2. Magna Mfg. v. Aetna Cas.18 A.2d 565 (N.J. Ct. of Ch. 1941)
  3. Houston Petroleum Co. v. AUTOMOTIVE, ETC., ASS'N83 A.2d 239 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1951)

Most recent

  1. Houston Petroleum Co. v. AUTOMOTIVE, ETC., ASS'N83 A.2d 239 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1951)
  2. Casriel v. King58 A.2d 269 (N.J. Ct. of Ch. 1948)
  3. Magna Mfg. v. Aetna Cas.18 A.2d 565 (N.J. Ct. of Ch. 1941)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list