TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Burroughs Wellcome & Co. v. Weissbard

Burroughs Wellcome & Co. (U. S. A.), Inc., Respondent, v. Harry Weissbard Et Al., Individually, &C., Appellants

Burroughs Wellcome & Co. v. Weissbard, 23 A.2d 396 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1942)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · State Appellate Courts
Decided
January 9, 1942
Judges
PER CURIAM.
Citations
23 A.2d 396130 N.J. Eq. 6051942 N.J. LEXIS 565

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Egan and reported at 129 N. J. Eq. 563.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Porter, Colie, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeerty, Hague, Thompson, JJ. 12.

For reversal — Case, Perskie, JJ. 2.’

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1962: 11968: 119622026peak 1962 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Texas Co. v. Di Gaetano177 A.2d 273 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1962)
  2. Vornado, Inc. v. Corning Glass Works388 F.2d 117 (3d Cir. 1968)

Most recent

  1. Vornado, Inc. v. Corning Glass Works388 F.2d 117 (3d Cir. 1968)
  2. Texas Co. v. Di Gaetano177 A.2d 273 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1962)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list