Deschamps v. L. Bamberger & Co.
Alice Deschamps and Desire Joseph Deschamps, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. L. Bamberger & Co., Defendant-Appellant
Opinion of the Court
*518 Per Curiam.
The judgment appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the opinion of the Supreme Court, with the reservation, however, that we do not consider or pass upon the points argued in the briéf of appellant respecting alleged error committed by the trial court in certain rulings on evidence made during the course of the trial, and alleged error contained in the submission of the matter to the jury, for the reason that these points are not properly set forth in the grounds of appeal.
538.
The judgment appealed from is affirmed.
For affirmance —Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Dear, Rafferty, Hague, Thompson, JJ. 8.
For reversal—The Chancellor, Case, Colie, Wells, JJ. 4.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.