Mengel Co. v. Pierson
The Mengel Company Et Al., Appellants, v. D. Van Ness Pierson Et Al., Respondents
Mengel Co. v. Pierson, 132 A. 78 (N.J. 1926)
Opinion of the Court
*441 Per Curiam.
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Eielder.
For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisoh, Black, Campbell, Lloyd, Mc-Glennon, Kays, Hbteield, JJ. 11.
For reversal — Katzenbach, White, Van Buskirk, JJ.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 3 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.