Aron v. Rialto Realty Co.
Sol Aron Et Al., Appellants, v. Rialto Realty Company, Incorporated, Et Al., Respondents
Aron v. Rialto Realty Co., 140 A. 918 (N.J. 1928)
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Berry, and reported in 100 N. J. Eq. 513.
For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, -Kalisch, Black,. Katzenbaoh, Campbell, Lloyd, White,.Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Heteield, Dear, JJ. 15.
For reversal — None.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 15 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
- Frg-X-Nj2, Lp v. Robmar Realty Associates
- DANIEL SIKORSKI, ETC. VS. NEW JERSEY VENTURES PARTNERS, LLC (L-0861-20, GLOUCESTER COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
- PETER HILAL VS. DONGYOUN HAN (DC-018059-17, BERGEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
- Boylan v. Jackson National Life Insurance
- GE CAPITAL MORTG. SERV., INC. v. Marilao
- Van Allen v. BD. OF COM'RS OF TP. OF BASS RIV.
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.