Van Blarcom v. Van Blarcom
John I. Van Blarcom, Complainants-Respondents v. Irene Van Blarcom
Van Blarcom v. Van Blarcom, 199 A. 383 (N.J. 1938)
Opinion of the Court
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the opinion delivered by Vice-Chancellor Lewis in the court of chancery.
For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, PORTER, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, WALKER, JJ. 15.
For reversal — None. *Page 20
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 5 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
- Hogg v. Walker
- TR. OF CLIENTS'SEC. FUND v. Yucht
- TR. OF CLIENTS'SEC. FUND v. Miller
- Capital Investors Co. v. Executors of the Estate of Morrison
- Capital Investors Co. v. Executors of the Estate of Arthur R. Morrison, and Webb C. Hayes, Iii, Personal Representative of the Estate of Norman B. Frost, Deceased Sadie R. Dreisen, Personal Representative of the Estate of Harry Dreisen, Deceased, Capital Investors, Co. v. Executors of the Estate of Arthur R. Morrison, and Webb C. Hayes, Iii, Personal Representatives of the Estate of Norman B. Frost, Deceased Sadie R. Dreisen, Personal Representative of the Estate of Harry Dreisen, Deceased
Most recent
- Hogg v. Walker
- TR. OF CLIENTS'SEC. FUND v. Miller
- TR. OF CLIENTS'SEC. FUND v. Yucht
- Capital Investors Co. v. Executors of the Estate of Arthur R. Morrison, and Webb C. Hayes, Iii, Personal Representative of the Estate of Norman B. Frost, Deceased Sadie R. Dreisen, Personal Representative of the Estate of Harry Dreisen, Deceased, Capital Investors, Co. v. Executors of the Estate of Arthur R. Morrison, and Webb C. Hayes, Iii, Personal Representatives of the Estate of Norman B. Frost, Deceased Sadie R. Dreisen, Personal Representative of the Estate of Harry Dreisen, Deceased
- Capital Investors Co. v. Executors of the Estate of Morrison
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.