Simon Vasquez-Contreras v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
Simon VASQUEZ-CONTRERAS, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent
Opinion
PER CURIAM.
The petitioner petitions this court to review an order by the Board of Immigration Appeals denying to the petitioner a new grant of voluntary departure and dismissing an appeal from an immigration judge’s denial of petitioner’s motion to reopen the deportation proceedings against him. Our review is limited to the determination of whether the denial of petitioner’s motions was an abuse of discretion.
Gena v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 424 F.2d 227, 232 (5th Cir. 1970). We hold the Board’s order of December 14, 1977 was not an abuse of discretion. “Although an abundance of administrative patience has prolonged petitioner’s presence in this country, the time has come to write finis to these proceedings.”
Id.
at 233 .
The order of the Board is affirmed and the petition for review is dismissed.
DISMISSED.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 8 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
- Moises Garcia-Mir v. William French Smith
- Fidelis Osuchukwu v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
- Ka Fung Chan v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
- Sunil Lotus Aiyadurai v. Immigration and Naturalization Service and Gerald L. Coyle, District Director of Immigration and Naturalization Service
- Hamid Bahramnia v. United States Immigration and Naturalization Service
- James Othello Yahkpua v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
Most recent
- Hamid Bahramnia v. United States Immigration and Naturalization Service
- James Othello Yahkpua v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
- Moises Garcia-Mir v. William French Smith
- Fidelis Osuchukwu v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
- Sunil Lotus Aiyadurai v. Immigration and Naturalization Service and Gerald L. Coyle, District Director of Immigration and Naturalization Service
- Te Kuei Liu v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.