TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Duke Power Co. v. Essex County Board of Taxation

Duke Power Company, Respondent, v. the Essex County Board of Taxation and the City of Newark, Appellants

Duke Power Co. v. Essex Cnty. Bd. of Taxation, 11 A.2d 21 (N.J. 1940)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey · State Highest Courts
Decided
January 25, 1940
Judges
PER CURIAM.
Citations
11 A.2d 21124 N.J.L. 411940 N.J. LEXIS 230

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

*42 Pee Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Bodine in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance —The Chief Justice, Trenchard, Case, Donges, Heher, Porter, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, JJ. 10.

To remand —The Chancellor. 1.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1964: 119642026peak 1964 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Bogota v. Brewster Equip. Co.200 A.2d 629 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1964)

Most recent

  1. Bogota v. Brewster Equip. Co.200 A.2d 629 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1964)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list