TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Weiss v. Central Cafeteria

D. Richard Weiss, Complainant, v. Central Cafeteria, a Corporation, Defendant

Weiss v. Cent. Cafeteria, 164 A. 15 (N.J. 1933)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey · State Highest Courts
Decided
January 5, 1933
Judges
PER CURIAM.
Citations
164 A. 15112 N.J. Eq. 232

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

Pee Curiam.

The order appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion delivered by Vice-Chancellor Church in the court of chancery.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Brogan, Heher, Kays, Heteield, Wells, Kerney, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1949: 119492026peak 1949 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Bruck v. the Credit Corp.65 A.2d 852 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1949)

Most recent

  1. Bruck v. the Credit Corp.65 A.2d 852 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1949)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list