TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Von Volkum v. Swift & Co.

Frank Von Volkum, Appellant, v. Swift & Co., Respondent

Von Volkum v. Swift & Co., 40 A.2d 572 (N.J. 1945)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey · State Highest Courts
Decided
January 4, 1945
Judges
PER CURIAM.
Citations
40 A.2d 572132 N.J.L. 3441945 N.J. LEXIS 162

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Perskie in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Donges, Perskie, Colie, Wells, Rafferty, Hague, Thompson, Dill, JJ. 11.

For reversal — Hone.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1957: 11959: 11961: 119572026peak 1957 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Jacobs v. Kaplan152 A.2d 145 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1959)
  2. Aromando v. Rubin Bros. Drug Sales Co.136 A.2d 11 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1957)
  3. Barry v. Wallace J. Wilck, Inc.167 A.2d 181 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1961)

Most recent

  1. Barry v. Wallace J. Wilck, Inc.167 A.2d 181 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1961)
  2. Jacobs v. Kaplan152 A.2d 145 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1959)
  3. Aromando v. Rubin Bros. Drug Sales Co.136 A.2d 11 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1957)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list