O'Brien v. O'Brien
Lauretta v. O’Brien, Appellant, v. Thomas M. O’Brien, Respondent
O'Brien v. O'Brien, 147 A. 911 (N.J. 1929)
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.
The decree appealed from will he affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Rallón, and reported in 103 N. J. Eg. 214.
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Kalisch, Black, Campbell, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, White, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, JJ.. 15.
For reversal — Done.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 7 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.