TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Kenney v. Paterson Milk & Cream Co.

Thomas H. Kenney, Appellant, v. Paterson Milk and Cream Company Et Al., Respondents

Kenney v. Paterson Milk & Cream Co., 164 A. 274 (N.J. 1933)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey · State Highest Courts
Decided
January 23, 1933
Judges
PER CURIAM.
Citations
164 A. 274110 N.J.L. 1411933 N.J. LEXIS 44888 A.L.R. 1416
Cited by 37

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

Pee Curiam.

The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons given in the opinion filed in the Passaic County Circuit Court by Judge Maekay.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Heher, Kays, Heteield, Wells, JJ. 9.

For reversal — Bodine, Donges, Brogan, Keeney,- JJ. 4.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 37 cases

View all citing references →
1942: 11943: 11945: 11946: 21949: 11950: 11951: 31952: 11955: 11958: 21961: 11963: 11967: 11968: 11970: 11971: 11974: 11976: 11978: 31981: 11982: 11983: 11987: 11988: 21989: 21990: 21991: 219422026peak 1951 · 3

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. John J. Cooney and F. Dring Wetherill -Cross v. Donald W939 F.2d 81 (3d Cir. 1991)
  2. KAZMER-STANDISH, ETC. v. Schoeffel Instrument426 A.2d 1061 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1981)
  3. Kazmer-Standish Consultants, Inc. v. Schoeffel Instruments Corp.445 A.2d 1149 (N.J. 1982)
  4. Cohen v. Scola80 A.2d 643 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1951)
  5. Ford v. American Medical International, Inc.422 N.W.2d 67 (Neb. 1988)
  6. Dalton, Dalton, Little, Inc. v. Mirandi412 F. Supp. 1001 (D.N.J. 1976)

Most recent

  1. John J. Cooney and F. Dring Wetherill -Cross v. Donald W939 F.2d 81 (3d Cir. 1991)
  2. Kanengiser v. Kanengiser590 A.2d 1223 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1991)
  3. Maryland Real Estate Commission v. Johnson576 A.2d 760 (Md. 1990)
  4. Irving B. Gruber v. Owens-Illinois Inc.899 F.2d 1366 (3d Cir. 1990)
  5. Scott/Hubbard Co., Inc. v. Sika Chemical Corp.708 F. Supp. 945 (N.D. Ill. 1989)
  6. Lockridge v. Hale764 S.W.2d 84 (Ky. Ct. App. 1989)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list