TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Dr. Dadirrian and Sons Company v. Hauenstein

Dr. Dadirrian and Sons Company, Respondent, v. William Hauenstein, Appellant

Dadirrian & Sons Co. v. Hauenstein, 67 N.E. 1081 (N.Y. 1903)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
June 25, 1903
Citations
67 N.E. 1081175 N.Y. 5221903 N.Y. LEXIS 1113
Summary
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered July 31, 1902, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Judgment affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.

Concur: Bartlett, Haight, Martin, Vann, Cullen and Werner, JJ. Hot voting: Parker, Oh. J.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1914: 119142026peak 1914 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Leavitt v. Waldemar Co.88 Misc. 285 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1914)

Most recent

  1. Leavitt v. Waldemar Co.88 Misc. 285 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1914)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list