TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Ensign v. Central New York Telephone and Telegraph Co.

W. Martin Jones, Appellant, v. New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Respondent

Ensign v. Cent. N.Y. Tel. & Tel. Co., 71 N.E. 1130 (N.Y. 1904)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
August 5, 1904
Citations
71 N.E. 1130179 N.Y. 5391904 N.Y. LEXIS 1171
Summary
Appeal from a judgment, entered April 1, 1903,. upon an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, overruling plaintiff’s exceptions ordered to be heard in the first instance by the Appellate Division, denying a motion for a new trial and directing judgment for defendant.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Bartlett, Martin, "V ann, Cullen and Werner, JJ. Absent: ITaight, J.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1940: 119402026peak 1940 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Ray v. New York Telephone Co.260 A.D. 405 (1940)

Most recent

  1. Ray v. New York Telephone Co.260 A.D. 405 (1940)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list