TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Thomas v. Schumacher

Landon A. Thomas Et Al., Composing the Firm of Fleming, Thomas & Co., Respondents, v. Charles Schumacher Et Al., Appellants

Thomas v. Schumacher, 57 N.E. 1118 (N.Y. 1900)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
May 8, 1900
Citations
57 N.E. 1118163 N.Y. 5541900 N.Y. LEXIS 1105
Summary
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered May 20, 1897, reversing a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court on trial at Special Term, and granting a new trial.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered for plaintiffs on the stipulation, with costs, on opinion below.

Concur: O’Brien, Bartlett, Martin, Yann and Landon, JJ. Not sitting: Parker, Ch. J. Not voting: Haight, J.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1902: 11903: 11909: 11911: 11916: 11917: 11926: 11954: 119022026peak 1902 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Black v. Vanderbilt70 A.D. 16 (1902) · Dissent
  2. George A. Ohl & Co. v. Standard Steel Sections, Inc.179 A.D. 637 (1917)
  3. Everett v. De Fontaine78 A.D. 219 (1903)
  4. Simon v. Burgess146 A.D. 37 (1911)
  5. April Productions, Inc. v. G. Schirmer, Inc.284 A.D. 639 (1954)
  6. Westergren v. Everett218 A.D. 172 (1926)

Most recent

  1. April Productions, Inc. v. G. Schirmer, Inc.284 A.D. 639 (1954)
  2. Westergren v. Everett218 A.D. 172 (1926)
  3. George A. Ohl & Co. v. Standard Steel Sections, Inc.179 A.D. 637 (1917)
  4. Guinan v. Blum93 Misc. 667 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1916)
  5. Simon v. Burgess146 A.D. 37 (1911)
  6. Karst v. Prang Educational Co.132 A.D. 197 (1909)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list