TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Herzog v. Municipal Electric Light Company

Paul M. Herzog, as Receiver for the Benefit of Creditors of Joseph Ryan, Appellant, v. Municipal Electric Light Company, Respondent

Herzog v. Mun. Elec. Light Co., 72 N.E. 1143 (N.Y. 1904)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
December 30, 1904
Citations
72 N.E. 1143180 N.Y. 5181904 N.Y. LEXIS 1342
Summary
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered January 15, 1904, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court at a Trial Term.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien and Haight, JJ. Dissenting: Bartlett, Martin and Vann, JJ.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1905: 119052026peak 1905 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. McMullen v. City of New York104 A.D. 337 (1905)

Most recent

  1. McMullen v. City of New York104 A.D. 337 (1905)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list