Davids v. Bauer
Louisa A. Davids Et Al., as Executors of Durias Seacord, Deceased, Appellants, v. Louis Bauer, Respondent
Davids v. Bauer, 102 N.E. 1101 (N.Y. 1913)
Summary
Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered February ‘l, 1913, which affirmed an interlocutory judgment of Special Term overruling a demurrer to the answer in an action for an accounting.
The following questions were certified: “(1) Does the amended complaint in this action state facts sufficient to. constitute a cause of action? (2) Is the first separate and affirmative defense contained in defendant’s answer sufficient in law upon the face thereof ? (3) Is the second separate and affirmative defense contained in defendant’s answer sufficient in law upon the face thereof? (4) Is the third separate and affirmative defense contained in defendant’s answer sufficient in law upon the face thereof ? (5) Is the fourth separate and affirmative defense contained in defendant’s answer sufficient in law upon the face thereof ? (6) Is the sixth separate and affirmative defense contained in defendant’s answer sufficient in law upon the face thereof ? (7) Is the seventh separate and affirmative defense contained in defendant’s answer sufficient in law upon the face thereof ? ”
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Order affirmed, with costs, first question certified answered in the negative; the other questions not answered; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., Gray, Hiscock, Chase, Hogan and Miller, JJ. Absent: Willard Bartlett, J.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.