TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Mechanics' Banking Ass'n v. New York & Saugerties White Lead Co.

The Mechanics’ Banking Association, Respondent, v. the New York and Saugerties White Lead Company, Appellant

Mechanics' Banking Ass'n v. N.Y. & Saugerties White Lead Co., 35 N.Y. 505 (1866)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
September 5, 1866
Judges
Pobteb
Citations
35 N.Y. 505
Headnotes
A corporation is bound, by its indorsement of commercial paper, for the accommodation of the maker, in respect to a bona fide holder, who discounts it before maturity on the faith of its being business paper.
Summary
Appeal from the Supreme Court. The action was on a promissory note for $1,250, made by one James B. Townsend, payable to the order of the New York & Saugerties White Lead Company, and indorsed by -that company, and by the Spring Yalley Shot and Lead Company, by James McCullogh, as president of each of said companies. The note was made by Townsend, and indorsed by the appellant, for the accommodation of the Spring Yalley Shot and Lead Company. McCullogh was not only the president, but also the financial officer of both these companies. He had previously made and indorsed notes in behalf of each of them, with the knowledge of the respective directors. At the time of the transaction in question, the following entry was made in the appellant’s bill book: “ This note was used by the Spring Yalley Shot and Lead Manufacturing Company, discounted at their bank, of which they received the proceeds, and is to be paid by them at maturity.” The Spring Valley Company had an account at the plaintiff’s hank. The White Lead Company had none. The note was discounted for the Spring Valley Company, and that company received the whole of the proceeds; the appellant being a mere accommodation indorser, and deriving no benefit from the transaction. The plaintiff, at the time of the discount, had no notice of these facts, and made the discount in good faith, the note being in the usual form of business paper. Upon this state of facts, judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiff by'Mr. Justice E. Dahwht Smith, before whom the cause was tried, without a jury. The judgment was affirmed, on appeal, at the General Term in the first judicial district, the opinion of the court being delivered by Mr. Justice Hogebooh.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Pobteb

Pobteb, J.

There was nothing on the face of the note to indicate that it was not business paper. The appellant was the payee, and the indorsement was made by the proper officer, and in the usual form. The respondent discounted the note in good faith, and in the usual course of business. The bank had no notice that it was made or indorsed for the accommodation of the borrower, and the defense was, therefore, properly overruled.

(Bank of Genesee v. Patchin Bank, 13 N. Y., 315 ; 19 id., 312;

Farmers’ & Mechanics’ Bank v. Butchers’ & Drovers’ Bank, 16 id., 129;

Olcott v. Tioga Railroad Company, 27 id., 546;

Bank of New York v. Muskingum Branch Bank, 29 id., 619.)

The judgment should be affirmed.

Leomabd, J., also read an opinion to the same effect.

All the judges concurring, Judgment affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 15 cases

View all citing references →
1886–1887: 11888–1889: 21890–1891: 21892–1893: 21896–1897: 11898–1899: 11904–1905: 11908–1909: 11912–1913: 11914–1915: 11920–1921: 11930–1931: 118862026peak 1888 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Jacobus v. Jamestown Mantel Co.105 N.E. 210 (N.Y. 1914)
  2. Farmers' Nat. Bank v. Sutton Manuf'g Co.52 F. 191 (6th Cir. 1892)
  3. Tod v. Kentucky Union Land Co.57 F. 47 (1893)
  4. Scherer v. Everest168 F. 822 (8th Cir. 1909)
  5. In re John B. Rose Co.275 F. 416 (2d Cir. 1921)
  6. Bremen Saving Bank v. Branch-Crookes Saw Co.104 Mo. 425 (1891)

Most recent

  1. Chase National Bank v. Rosenbaum142 Misc. 349 (1931)
  2. In re John B. Rose Co.275 F. 416 (2d Cir. 1921)
  3. Jacobus v. Jamestown Mantel Co.105 N.E. 210 (N.Y. 1914)
  4. La Normandie Hotel Co. v. Security Trust Co.38 App. D.C. 187 (D.C. Cir. 1912)
  5. Scherer v. Everest168 F. 822 (8th Cir. 1909)
  6. In re Troy & Cohoes Shirt Co.136 F. 420 (N.D.N.Y. 1905)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list