Buckley v. Stansfield
Della M. Buckley, Appellant and Respondent, v. William H. Stansfield, Respondent and Appellant, Impleaded With Others
Buckley v. Stansfield, 108 N.E. 1090 (N.Y. 1915)
Summary
Cross-appeals from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered March 11, 1913, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff for an amount less than her claim, entered upon the report of a referee in an action brought and maintained by the plaintiff, a judgment creditor of the defendant United Cloak and Suit Company, under subdivision 2 of section 90 of the General Corporation Law, to compel the defendant William H. Stansfield, as a director of said corporation, to account for the value of property transferred by him as one of the directors, in violation of his duty, as such director, to the extent of the plaintiff’s judgment against the corporation whose property was transferred, and to recover the amount of said judgment against the defendant Stansfield.
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Judgment affirmed, without costs; no opinion.
Concur: Willard Bartlett, Ch. J., Hiscock, Chase, Cuddeback, Miller and Seabury, JJ. Not sitting: Hogan, J.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 17 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.