Brandyce v. United States Lloyds, Inc.
Henry D. Brandyce Et Al., Copartners Under the Firm Name of H. D. Brandyce & Company, Respondents, v. United States Lloyds, Inc., Appellant
Brandyce v. United States Lloyds, Inc., 147 N.E. 201 (N.Y. 1924)
Opinion of the Court
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Hiscock, Ch. J., Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane, Andrews aud Lehman, JJ.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 7 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
- Lanasa Fruit Steamship & Importing Co. v. Universal Insurance
- Mork v. Eureka-Security Fire & Marine Insurance Co.
- Norwich Union Fire Ins. Soc. Ltd. v. Board of Commissioners
- North River Ins. v. Clark
- Archer-Daniels-Midland Co. v. Phoenix Assurance Co.
- Lanasa Fruit Steamship & Importing Co. v. Universal Ins.
Most recent
- Archer-Daniels-Midland Co. v. Phoenix Assurance Co.
- Mork v. Eureka-Security Fire & Marine Insurance Co.
- Norwich Union Fire Ins. Soc. Ltd. v. Board of Commissioners
- Lanasa Fruit Steamship & Importing Co. v. Universal Insurance
- Lanasa Fruit Steamship & Importing Co. v. Universal Ins.
- Lanasa Fruit Steamship & Importing Co. v. Universal Ins.
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.