TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Judson v. City of Niagara Falls

George D. Judson, Respondent, v. City of Niagara Falls, Appellant

Judson v. City of Niagara Falls, 97 N.E. 1107 (N.Y. 1912)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
February 2, 1912
Citations
97 N.E. 1107204 N.Y. 6301912 N.Y. LEXIS 856
Cited by 16
Summary
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered July 15, 1910, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict directed by the court in an action by an attorney to recover for services.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., Gray, Haight, Vann, Werner, Hisoock and Collin, JJ.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 16 cases

View all citing references →
1922: 11923: 11934: 11937: 11940: 11941: 11957: 11964: 11971: 11972: 11975: 11979: 11983: 21988: 12007: 119222026peak 1983 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Cahn v. Town of Huntington278 N.E.2d 908 (N.Y. 1972)
  2. Corning v. Village of Laurel Hollow398 N.E.2d 537 (N.Y. 1979) · Dissent
  3. Fleischmann v. Graves138 N.E. 745 (N.Y. 1923)
  4. Kay v. Board of Higher Education260 A.D. 9 (1940)
  5. Hiscox v. Holmes239 A.D. 602 (1934)
  6. Clark v. Smith250 A.D. 233 (1937)

Most recent

  1. Ceitlin v. City of New York16 Misc. 3d 887 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2007)
  2. Caruso v. New York City Police Department Pension Funds136 A.D.2d 266 (1988)
  3. Caruso v. New York City Police Department Pension Funds122 Misc. 2d 576 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1983)
  4. People v. Cassidy118 Misc. 2d 110 (N.Y. City Crim. Ct. 1983)
  5. Corning v. Village of Laurel Hollow398 N.E.2d 537 (N.Y. 1979) · Dissent
  6. Hanna v. Rewkowski81 Misc. 2d 498 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1975)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list