TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Bates v. Ludwig

Mary T. Bates, Respondent, v. Bernhard J. Ludwig Et Al., Appellants

Bates v. Ludwig, 64 N.E. 1125 (N.Y. 1902)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
June 17, 1902
Citations
64 N.E. 1125171 N.Y. 6761902 N.Y. LEXIS 981
Summary
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered June 21, 1901, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying- a motion for a new trial.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Judgment affirmed, with costs, on authority of Howard v. Ludwig ( 171 N. Y. 507 ); no opinion.

Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Martin and Vann, JJ.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Howard v. Ludwig, 64 N.E. 172 (N.Y. 1902) 36

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list