TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Rich v. Manhattan Railway Company

Alexander Rich, Appellant, v. the Manhattan Railway Company Et Al., Respondents

Rich v. Manhattan Ry. Co., 34 N.E. 402 (N.Y. 1893)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
June 27, 1893
Citations
34 N.E. 402138 N.Y. 66893 Sickels 6681893 N.Y. LEXIS 954
Headnotes
The judgment in an equity action adjudged that plaintiff was not entitled to equitable relief, and that unless within twenty days after entry of judgment, or if an appeal was taken within twenty days after entry of order on final appeal, plaintiff served notice of intention to try the action as one at law, and paid the costs, defendants might enter an order dismissing the complaint. Held, that the judgment was not a final one, and so was not reviewable here.
Summary
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Court 'of Common Pleas for the city and county of New York, entered upon an order made March 1Y, 1892, which affirmed adjudgment in favor of defendants, entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term. The following is the opinion in full: “The judgment in this action adjudged that the plaintiff was not entitled to equitable relief, and directed a dismissal of the complaint, with costs, unless within twenty days from its entry or, if an appeal was taken within twenty days after the entry of the order on' the final appeal, the plaintiff served notice upon the defendants that he elected to try the action for damages to the premises described as an action at law before a jury and pay the costs incurred to the date of notice, and if the plaintiff failed to make such election within the time specified the defendants might enter an order dismissing the complaint, with costs. “ This was plainly not a final judgment, and hence not appealable to this court, and we cannot, therefore, now consider or determine any of the questions involving the merits which have been discussed upon the briefs of the counsel for the plaintiff and the other property holders similarly situated. “ The appeal must be dismissed, with costs.”

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

Per Curiam mem.

for dismissal of appeal.

All concur.

Appeal dismissed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list