TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Beste v. Burger

Henry Beste Et Al., Appellants v. Henry S. Burger Et Al., Respondents

Beste v. Burger, 17 N.E. 734 (N.Y. 1888)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
June 29, 1888
Citations
17 N.E. 734110 N.Y. 6441888 N.Y. LEXIS 945
Summary
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Court of Common Pleas in and for the city and county of New York, entered upon an order made December 7,1885, which affirmed a judgment in favor of defendants, entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term. This action was brought by judgment-creditors of a firm to set aside an assignment made by surviving members of the firm for the benefit of creditors. The contention of plaintiffs was that the surviving members, had no right to make the assignment. ■ Held otherwise on authority of Williams v. Whedon (109 N. Y. 333). Plaintiff sought to prove declarations of the assignors after the assignment, this was objected to as incompetent against the assignee; after this objection the offer was persisted in by plaintiffs without any suggestion that the evidence was competent as against the parties making the declarations. The objection was sustained. Held, no error, that as the evidence was offered against all the defendants it was properly excluded.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

All concur.

Judgment affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1891: 21944: 118912026peak 1891 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Bloodgood v. Lynch56 N.E.2d 718 (N.Y. 1944)
  2. The First National Bank of Peru v. Parsons27 N.E. 486 (Ind. 1891)
  3. Wise v. Grant13 N.Y.S. 376 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1891)

Most recent

  1. Bloodgood v. Lynch56 N.E.2d 718 (N.Y. 1944)
  2. The First National Bank of Peru v. Parsons27 N.E. 486 (Ind. 1891)
  3. Wise v. Grant13 N.Y.S. 376 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1891)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list