TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Dobbins v. Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Rd. Co.

Joseph Dobbins, Respondent, v. Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad Company, Appellant

Dobbins v. Del., Lackawanna & Western Rd. Co., 124 N.E. 896 (N.Y. 1919)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
July 15, 1919
Citations
124 N.E. 896227 N.Y. 5651919 N.Y. LEXIS 708
Summary
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered March 13, 1917, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict. Plaintiff loaded on defendant’s cars and tendered for shipment some 27,000 pounds of cabbage together with a bill of lading. Defendant’s agent wrote on the face of the bill of lading the words “ More or less frozen when received.” Later plaintiff returned the bill of lading to the station agent and demanded a bill of lading free from the words descriptive of the condition of the cabbage. The agent refused to give a clean bill. The plaintiff refused to accept the bill containing the indorsement and gave it back to the agent. Failing to accomplish the making of any contract of shipment, the plaintiff told the agent that he was compelled to throw the car over to the railroad company and let it take care of the cabbage loaded thereon. The railroad company thereafter shipped and sold the cabbage. This action was brought to recover its full value.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Hiscock, Ch. J., Collin, Cuddeback, Cardozo, Pound and Andrews, JJ. Not sitting: McLaughlin, J.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1926: 119262026peak 1926 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Universal By-Products Corp. v. Schwartz216 A.D. 311 (1926)

Most recent

  1. Universal By-Products Corp. v. Schwartz216 A.D. 311 (1926)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list