TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Smith v. Ryan

Charles H. Smith, Respondent, v. Joseph Ryan, Appellant

Smith v. Ryan, 29 N.E. 1033 (N.Y. 1891)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
December 1, 1891
Citations
29 N.E. 1033130 N.Y. 6531891 N.Y. LEXIS 1303
Summary
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the City Court of Brooklyn, entered upon an order made February 24, 1890, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff, entered upon a verdict and affirmed an order denying a motion for a new trial.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Agree to affirm; no opinion.

All concur.

Judgment affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1942: 11961: 119422026peak 1942 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Nickelsburg v. City of New York263 A.D. 625 (1942)
  2. Smith v. City of Corning14 A.D.2d 27 (1961)

Most recent

  1. Smith v. City of Corning14 A.D.2d 27 (1961)
  2. Nickelsburg v. City of New York263 A.D. 625 (1942)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list