TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Watts v. Adler

James R. Watts v. . Samuel B. Adler

Watts v. Adler, 29 N.E. 131 (N.Y. 1891)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
December 1, 1891
Citations
29 N.E. 131130 N.Y. 6461891 N.Y. LEXIS 1299
Cited by 12

Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 648

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 649

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 650

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 651 VANN, J., reads for reversal and new trial.

All concur.

Judgment reversed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 12 cases

View all citing references →
1893: 11894: 31901: 11910: 11918: 21922: 11933: 11987: 11992: 118932026peak 1894 · 3

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. McCann v. Hazard36 Misc. 7 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1901)
  2. Bloomquist v. Farson118 N.E. 855 (N.Y. 1918)
  3. Williamsburgh Savings Bank v. Town of Solon32 N.E. 1058 (N.Y. 1893)
  4. Notch View Associates v. Smith615 A.2d 676 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1992)
  5. First National Bank v. Schuetz173 P. 278 (Kan. 1918)
  6. Arnold v. Burgess747 P.2d 1315 (Idaho Ct. App. 1987)

Most recent

  1. Notch View Associates v. Smith615 A.2d 676 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1992)
  2. Arnold v. Burgess747 P.2d 1315 (Idaho Ct. App. 1987)
  3. Witcombe v. Schulte Real Estate Co.238 A.D. 58 (1933)
  4. Durant v. Whedon201 A.D. 196 (1922)
  5. First National Bank v. Schuetz173 P. 278 (Kan. 1918)
  6. Bloomquist v. Farson118 N.E. 855 (N.Y. 1918)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list