TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Morris v. Cashmore, Burke

A. Newbold Morris Et Al., as Members of the Council of the City of New York, Appellants, v. John Cashmore, Respondent, and James A. Burke, Appellant

Morris v. Cashmore, 17 N.E.2d 143 (N.Y. 1938)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
October 18, 1938
Citations
17 N.E.2d 143278 N.Y. 7301938 N.Y. LEXIS 1547
Cited by 17 1 descriptions by later courts

Opinion of the Court

Judgment affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., O’Brien, Hubbs, Loughran, Finch and Rippey, JJ. Taking no part: Lehman, J. ■

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

  • (General Construction Law § 41 , which requires public entities to act by a majority of the whole and not by majority of a quorum, does not restrict rule-making as to intra-cameral matters)
    Opn. No. (N.Y. Att'y Gen. Aug. 28, 2007)

Cited by 17 cases

View all citing references →
1939: 11940: 11953: 21959: 11961: 11966: 21967: 11972: 11976: 11977: 11980: 11985: 11996: 12003: 12007: 119392026peak 1953 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Town of Smithtown v. Howell292 N.E.2d 10 (N.Y. 1972)
  2. WOLKOFF v. Chassin675 N.E.2d 447 (N.Y. 1996)
  3. Boozer v. Johnson98 A.2d 76 (Del. Ch. 1953)
  4. Savatgy v. City of Kingston229 N.E.2d 203 (N.Y. 1967)
  5. New York State Guernsey Breeders' Co-operative, Inc. v. Noyes260 A.D. 139 (1940)
  6. Kaiser v. REAL ESTATE COM'N OF DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA155 A.2d 715 (D.C. 1959)

Most recent

  1. Opn. No.(N.Y. Att'y Gen. Aug. 28, 2007)
  2. State ex rel. Powers v. Curtis, Unpublished Decision (11-17-2003)2003 Ohio 6104 (2003)
  3. WOLKOFF v. Chassin675 N.E.2d 447 (N.Y. 1996)
  4. Formal Opinion No.(N.Y. Att'y Gen. Oct. 2, 1985)
  5. Michels v. Cuite104 Misc. 2d 540 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1980)
  6. Opn. No.(N.Y. Att'y Gen. Oct. 7, 1977)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list