TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Shultes v. Sickles

Arthur W. Shultes v. . Nicholas A. Sickles

Shultes v. Sickles, 41 N.E. 574 (N.Y. 1895)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
October 22, 1895
Citations
41 N.E. 574147 N.Y. 7041895 N.Y. LEXIS 1017
Cited by 16

Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 706

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 707

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 708

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 709 O'BRIEN, J., reads for affirmance of judgment, with costs.

All concur, except PECKHAM, J., taking no part.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 16 cases

View all citing references →
1896: 21897: 21898: 31899: 11900: 11903: 21908: 11910: 11928: 11935: 11937: 118962026peak 1898 · 3

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Second National Bank of Elmira v. Weston55 N.E. 1080 (N.Y. 1900)
  2. Parker v. Plympton273 P. 1030 (Colo. 1928) · Dissent
  3. Michigan Cent. R.R. Co. v. Spindler, Admr.5 N.E.2d 632 (Ind. 1937)
  4. Switzer v. Norton3 A.D. 173 (1896)
  5. Bennett v. Eastchester Gas Light Co.40 A.D. 169 (1899)
  6. Simons v. Supreme Council82 A.D. 617 (1903)

Most recent

  1. Michigan Cent. R.R. Co. v. Spindler, Admr.5 N.E.2d 632 (Ind. 1937)
  2. United States v. One Chevrolet 1935 Sedan12 F. Supp. 793 (W.D.N.Y. 1935)
  3. Parker v. Plympton273 P. 1030 (Colo. 1928) · Dissent
  4. Peniston v. Coleman141 A.D. 676 (1910)
  5. Strohm v. Zoellner61 Misc. 56 (1908)
  6. Simons v. Supreme Council82 A.D. 617 (1903)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list