Thomas Earl Henderson, Jr. v. Fort Worth Independent School District
Thomas Earl HENDERSON, Jr., Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. FORT WORTH INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT Et Al., Defendants-Appellants
Opinion
PER CURIAM:
In this case, a panel of the Court affirmed the district court by a written opin *116 ion.
Henderson v. Fort Worth Independent School District, 574 F.2d 1210 (5th Cir. 1978). A petition for rehearing en banc was granted, which effectively vacates the panel opinion as a citable precedent. With the panel opinion vacated, the en banc court has reached an even division as to the issues raised on appeal. Thus, the district court is affirmed by operation of law, and the decision of the court of appeals has no prece-dential value.
AFFIRMED BY OPERATION OF LAW.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 16 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
- Rita Johnson -Cross v. The State of Mississippi -Cross
- William Alvin Smith v. Walter Zant, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center
- Concerned Democrats of Florida v. Reno
- Iranian Students Association v. Edwin Edwards
- Criterion Club of Albany v. The Board of Commissioners of Dougherty County, Georgia
- United States v. Steven Scott Knutson
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.