Bristol v. Mente
Lavius F. Bristol, Respondent, v. Eugene W. Mente Et Al., Appellants
Bristol v. Mente, 70 N.E. 1096 (N.Y. 1904)
Summary
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered February 11, 1903, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial.
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., O’Brien, Bartlett, Yann and Werner, JJ. Dissenting: Haight and Cullen, JJ.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.