Cleveland v. Rice
In the Matter of the Claim of Fayette Cleveland, Respondent, Against Carlton J. Rice Et Al., Appellants; State Industrial Board, Respondent
Cleveland v. Rice, 147 N.E. 182 (N.Y. 1924)
Opinion of the Court
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Hiscock, Ch. J., Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane, Andrews and Lehman, JJ.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 4 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.