McLear v. Balmat
J. Hermon McLear, Appellant, v. Joseph Balmat Et Al., Defendants, Sylvia Lake Company, Incorporated, Et Al., Appellants, and Northern Ore Company Et Al., Respondents
McLear v. Balmat, 132 N.E. 883 (N.Y. 1921)
Headnotes
Practice — motion for leave to make payment into court, to amend answer and to reopen trial granted.
Summary
Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered January 31, 1921, which reversed an order of Special Term denying a motion by the Northern Ore Company for leave to make a certain payment into court and to amend its answer so as to show such payment and to reopen the trial in an action to partition certain real property and granted said motion. The following question was certified: “ Was it error of law for the Appellate Division to reverse the order of the Special Term denying the motion of the Northern Ore Company for leave to pay the $500 to the county treasurer, to amend its answer and to reopen the trial? ”
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Order affirmed, with costs, and question certified answered in the negative; no opinion.
Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Chase, Hogan, Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin and Andrews, JJ.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 6 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.