TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Felt Tarrant Mfg. Co. v. McGoldrick

In the Matter of Felt & Tarrant Mfg. Co., Respondent, Against Joseph D. McGoldrick, as Comptroller of the City of New York, Appellant

Felt Tarrant Mfg. Co. v. McGoldrick, 21 N.E.2d 198 (N.Y. 1939)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Subsequent history: rev'd, McGoldrick v. Felt & Tarrant Mfg. Co., 309 U.S. 70 (1940). (read from the later opinion; check before relying)

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
April 11, 1939
Citations
21 N.E.2d 198280 N.Y. 6881939 N.Y. LEXIS 1501

Opinion of the Court

Motion for reargument denied and motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and *689 when returned it will be amended by adding thereto after the words “ upon the authority of Matter of National Cash Register Co.

v. Taylor ( 276 N. Y. 208 ) ” the following:

“ and upon the sole ground that the City Sales Tax Law as here applied violates the commerce clause (article 1, section 8, clause 3) of the Constitution of the United States.” (See 279 N. Y. 678 .)

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Nat. Cash Register Co. v. Taylor, 11 N.E.2d 881 (N.Y. 1937) 16
Felt & Tarrant Mfg. Co. v. McGoldrick, 18 N.E.2d 311 (N.Y. 1938) 4

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list